February 24, 2005: Thoughts
of Dead Horses Stir Familiar Cry
By Ahchie
The
possibility that wild mustangs can be legally made into horsemeat is eliciting
an all too familiar response from the activist crowd. If it wasn’t this,
it was going to be something else. The new cause gives yet another opportunity
to see how activists will latch on to just about anything, and presents the
opportunity to review their modus operandi.
Reactions by activists always contain the same general elements:
In this latest example, a 34-year-old ban on the slaughter of wild horses running free across the West was repealed in December. The facts are simple. There are currently about 37,000 free-roaming horses and burros, which equates to 9,000 more than can be sustained by natural food supplies. In order to reduce the population, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will reach out to animal protection groups in an effort to find homes for the excess animals. In other words, the excess horses will be either adopted or sent to sanctuaries.
The activists are upset and would like for the public, whom they see as ignorant, to think that the precious mustangs are going to be gunned down on sight in shocking numbers and that soon the entire population of wild mustangs will be forever wiped from the face of the earth. They would like for the public to envision horse carcasses piled high and rotting across the fruited plain, while vultures circle overhead and swoop in for their feast. Never mind that no horses have been slaughtered yet due to the repeal of the ban. Never mind that there is a genuine need to reduce the population of wild horses. Never mind that the BLM has a plan for dealing with the problem and will use slaughter as the last resort.
The activist crowd, according to the co-founder of the horse protection group Wild Horse Spirit, feels that the repeal of the ban is, "really a slap in the face to the American people." The real slap to the face of the American people is a quote such as that.
Another aspect of activist behavior is that they demonstrate a paradox where they present themselves as sensitive to the animals, the environment, and nature, yet are essentially hostile and hateful to people. In 1998, three men were accused and acquitted in the shooting deaths of 33 horses near Reno. The men turned out to be innocent, but the lawyer who defended them received death threats and stated that the reaction to the case was far stronger than any homicide case he had ever experienced. The activists wanted whoever was responsible for the animal deaths to be hung from the gallows and no doubt hoped that they would suffer to a degree that was exponentially greater than the crime.
Whether the issue is dealing with an abundance of wild-horses and burros, getting up in arms over the shooting of a bear that invaded a Lake Tahoe home, fighting the clearing out of old-growth forests that have become extreme fire hazards, or whatever else is the cause of the day, the reaction from the activists is always the same.
The irony is that the activists often are the root cause of the problem. The sequence goes as such: the activists manage to get legislation to protect some non-human entity, the over protection leads to the protected entity getting over populated, the over population creates an unhealthy situation, the law finally changes so that something can be done to reduce the excess population, the activists react as outlined above saying that the protected entity is going to suffer and will be in danger of getting wiped out.
Horse-slaughtering law alarms activists
Associated Press, Scott Sonner, February 24, 2005
RENO, Nev. -- For the first time in more than a generation, the mustang - the very symbol of the American West - can be slaughtered for horsemeat.
In December, Congress repealed the 34-year-old ban on the slaughter of the wild horses that run free across the West. The move has brought a powerful backlash from activists, who want to reinstate full protection for the mustangs.
"It is really a slap in the face to the American people," said Betty Kelly, co-founder of the horse protection group Wild Horse Spirit in Virginia City, Nev.
Acting on behalf of ranchers who say the horses eat forage needed by cattle, Sen. Conrad Burns, R-Mont., attached the amendment in December to a spending bill that President Bush signed into law.
It allows for the sale for slaughter of some older and unwanted horses that are captured during the periodic government roundups aimed at reducing the wild population, now estimated at 33,000 across 10 Western states. About 19,000 of the horses are in Nevada.
A bill to reinstate the slaughter ban was introduced in Congress last month.
Responsibility for rounding up horses on federal land and selling them rests with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, which has yet to send any of the animals to slaughter.
BLM officials said the agency is reaching out to animal protection groups and is optimistic that before the summer, it will find new homes for the 8,900 horses and burros that could be subject to slaughter.
"We realize it is a challenge, but we think there are owners out there that would provide the kind of care we are looking for," BLM spokesman Tom Gorey said from Washington, D.C.
The issue has dogged the Interior Department and Congress since Nevada's Velma Johnson, also known as Wild Horse Annie, and a legion of schoolchildren persuaded Congress to outlaw the use of motor vehicles to hunt the mustangs in 1959. That was followed by the Wild Horse and Burro Protection Act of 1971.
Sylvia Fascio, a fifth-generation Nevada horse breeder, said there are too many wild horses roaming the BLM land next to her ranch, and some should be sold for slaughter.
"I enjoy the wild horses. I'm blessed to live out here among them and it's a very romantic thought. But there is such a thing as reality," Fascio said. "Since they can't seem to find homes for all of these horses all of the time, there is only one thing left. There are foreign countries that eat horsemeat. We don't now, but we did during World War II. I see nothing wrong with that."
The fate of the horses is also a question of cultural values, according to Mike Schroeder, a Washington state wildlife biologist. "I think of them more as livestock. But a lot of tribes I work with think of them as wildlife that should not be touched," he said in a speech to a Western Governors Association conference earlier this month.
It is a volatile issue. Scott Freeman, a defense attorney in Reno, defended one of three young men who were accused - and eventually acquitted of most charges - in the 1998 shooting deaths of 33 horses on the edge of Reno. The shootings outraged animal protection groups around the world and led to death threats against Freeman.
"I have lots of experience doing homicide cases, but I have never experienced the emotional outburst I did with the horse case," he said. "The rallying cry was for the defenseless animals and that the individuals - who in my case turned out to be innocent - should basically be strung up."
Burns said the repeal of the slaughter ban is necessary to manage the herds and protect the range. The measure allows the sale of horses more than 10 years old, as well as any that go unadopted three offerings in a row.
The BLM said it believes the 37,000 free-roaming wild horses and burros on the range are about 9,000 more than natural food supplies can sustain. Its aim is to bring the population down to about 28,000.
BLM Director Kathleen Clarke said the agency already is getting some responses in its effort to find homes for the animals and hopes to find a solution "in a way we feel good about."